Bible Classes in Georgia Schools
Thursday, March 8th, 2007I used to live in Georgia. I was born and raised there. I still consider it my home. Most of my and my wife’’s family are still there. So, I become really concerned when I hear that Georgia’’s legislature has decided to allow classes on the Bible to be taught in public school.
I have mixed emotions about this because I am a student of literature. I still spend a lot of time reading and thinking about literature and how it affects our lives. So, I understand how important the Bible and its themes, characters, and symbols are to a deeper understanding of western literature. I profess the Bible’’s importance as a foundational document for the study of literature, though I do not ascribe to its religious worship.
At the same time, I am deeply concerned that in the hands of teachers whose primary knowledge of and about the Bible comes from his or her religious experiences and not from his or her education experiences the line between study and worship may become blurred. I believe deeply in the separation of church and state. I believe even deeper in the dangers of indoctrinating young people with religion. They are not equipped to handle the big questions religion asks.
Within this heady brew of religion and state separation and the importance of thorough and well-rounded education, especially in the humanities, I see the state of Georgia throwing its teachers, who are notoriously underfunded and undertrained, into a precarious situation where personal beliefs are central to interpretation. It is neither fair nor intelligent to create such a path toward failure as this situation seems to do.
As a former teacher of literature at the high school level, I know full well how difficult it can be to be “neutral” on a wide array of topics while discussing things as personal as some literature becomes. How do we broach the use of the n-word in Twain’s Huckleberry Finn? How do we unpack Atticus Finch’s seeming collusion on hand with the racial injustice against which he fights on the other hand?
These are difficult literary questions even when something as clearly wrong as racism is involved. How then would we ever hope to study the Bible in a classroom where some of the students are likely to believe that the document is the word of God? How can we possibly go about interpreting the stories and symbols when some students will surely believe that the Bible is nothing but a literal list of dos and don’ts?
In the end, the dangerous part of all of this is not that any great injustice will be done to the students. They will be able to benefit from any discussion of religion and literature. The truly dangerous part is for the teachers themselves. How long until one of them is sued? It will take only one slip of the tongue or one interpretation, even if it is prefaced as only a possibility, to which someone takes offense.
Religion is still a part of this country for whom many people will suffer no slights. By its own definition, at least within many more literal Southern adherents, religion is not something you discuss, it is something you do. With that in mind, how is it possible to discuss the Bible within a classroom of kids and not have some of them think you are compelling them to do rather than to think?